Calliops

Closed beta · selecting our first partner teams

Never losea customer requestin a meeting again.

Calliops turns your meetings into product needs that are traced, deduplicated and specified. The AI structures. Your team decides.

6 h of meetings → 15 min of review → 0 digging. Four people hear the same request in four meetings: one line, cited four times.

The threshold

01 the whole team's meetings02 extraction and deduplication03 your call04 one shared register

Who it is for

For product teams that talk to a lot of customers.

The same requests come back ten times

One customer says it in discovery, another to support, a third to sales. Nobody sees it, because nobody heard all three.

Sales, Support and Product each hold a piece of the picture

Every team has its notes, its Slack channel, its CRM. Customer knowledge degrades every time it changes hands.

Nobody can find out why a feature was asked for

The decision is in a ticket, the reason in a meeting nobody replays. You argue it again, or you build without knowing.

Your PMs document instead of deciding

Two PMs and five customer meetings a week: Calliops is useful. Fifteen PMs and two hundred conversations a month: it becomes indispensable.

Before / after

Your team hears the same request four times without knowing it.

The same requirement comes back from three accounts, over eighteen days, in front of four different colleagues. Sales, Support and Product each work from their piece of the picture, and nobody joined them up. Calliops turns those fragments into a single line that keeps all four quotes and says which account each came from. You read, you seal. Nothing enters the register before that.

One request.4 sources.3 accounts.1 need.

Before · 4 meetings · 3 accounts · 18 days

3 Aug · Product review · Marion — “if we don’t offer an SSO-only way to sign in, Aster’s IT department will block us.”11 Aug · Vertu check-in · Thomas — “our security team doesn’t want to see a single password in the tool.”14 Aug · Sales feedback · Sacha — “Nolem pushed the signature back: they’re waiting on mandatory SSO.”21 Aug · Support · Inès — “third ticket this month asking to switch passwords off on the client side.”21 Aug · 00:15:41 · — inaudible —
Accounts
Aster · Vertu · Nolem
Meetings
4 · 3 to 21 August
Last mentioned
21 August 2026
AI draftBES-042

Signing in without a password, required by IT

Three accounts are asking for SSO-only sign-in. This is not a preference: it is a condition set by their IT departments, and it is already holding up a signature.

4 quotes · 3 accounts

“if we don’t offer an SSO-only way to sign in, Aster’s IT department will block us.”Aster · Product review · 3 Aug · 00:14:22
“our security team doesn’t want to see a single password in the tool.”Vertu · Check-in · 11 Aug · 00:07:55
“Nolem pushed the signature back: they’re waiting on mandatory SSO.”Nolem · Sales feedback · 14 Aug · 00:22:10
“third ticket this month asking to switch passwords off on the client side.”Aster · Support · 21 Aug · 00:03:41

register/BES-042 · theme “Security and access”

What comes out

Client intel, where somebody actually needs it.

The brief before the meeting

Before every upcoming meeting: what each attendee has already said, what is confirmed, what is still open. Nobody walks in and re-asks a question that was already answered.

The register of needs

One request, every account that raised it, every quote that proves it. The fourth client does not create a fourth line — it adds theirs to the first.

The map of themes

What an account actually talks about, over six months — not what you remember it talking about. Themes are drawn from sealed needs, never from drafts.

Ask it a question

Of one meeting, of one account, of the whole register. The answer cites its sources, timestamped, and your internal tools can query it too.

Traceability · nothing appears without its source

The AI files, it does not decide.

A generic AI writes

“Customers want SSO.”

Calliops writes

Aster · 3 Aug · 00:14:22Vertu · 11 Aug · 00:07:55Nolem · 14 Aug · 00:22:10Aster · Support · 21 Aug · 00:03:41

4 sources · 3 accounts · 1 need

Every line cites its meeting

Meeting, account, date, speaker, timestamp. One click from a need back to the sentence that produced it.

One gate, one person

It extracts, it deduplicates, it files — and it stops there: nothing in the system can write “and so here is what we should build”. One gate requires a person, and an unsealed item never enters the register.

States name what you control

AI draft · In review · Sealed · Closed · Dismissed. No internal status, no ambiguity.

How it works · seven steps, one gate

Every step is a transformation. Only one requires a person.

01CalendarThe meeting arrives with its transcript
02ContextAttendees, client account, project
03ExtractionDecisions, risks, requests, actions, ideas
04DeduplicationSaid four times, written once
05ReviewValidation gate — you seal
06RegisterThe need grows, by account and by theme
07Spec generationWhat the team has to build, written from the sealed needs, with their quotes

What it costs today

What does the lack of a shared memory cost you?

Calliops automates that part. Your PMs keep the review: fifteen minutes, not an hour.

€2,600

of write-up work per month

Connected today

Google CalendarGoogle MeetExtension ChromeNotionSlackMCP

The calendar brings the meetings in, the extension catches the ones it cannot see, Notion receives what has been sealed. Nothing else is connected yet.

Closed beta · first partner teams

Find out what your meetings already contain.

Your first meetings go through Calliops and you see what was in them: the repeated requests, the needs shared by several customers, the decisions with no source. For as long as the closed beta runs, the Organisation plan is free — three product spaces, unlimited meetings, the theme map. We open in waves, one product space at a time, and you get a reply within 24 hours, dated, not a newsletter.

A reply within 24 hours · no marketing sends